|
|
Post by unclebob on Jun 16, 2024 13:38:54 GMT
Not a good example at that price AND a manual gearbox. Autos demand those kind of prices. Would not gonear it without seeing rear subframe up on ramps. From experience I speak. Come in Bothy too. Agree that underbody needs to be sound, BK. It’s notable though that there’s no corrosion related advisories in the MoT history. Admittedly all the testers over the years could have been blind or incompetent but it’s a bit unlikely 😂. Having owned five 4.2s of varying ages up to 14 years, not one had any corrosion problems. Very lucky? Don’t know but five sound cars over about eighteen years is a pretty good record. IMHO the price isn’t bad, certainly not as stratospheric as they have been in the past.👍😊 I looked up the mot history as well….all seems good 👍🏻 manual or auto they are becoming more desirable, the Facebook Rav4 3 door club love them 😉 |
|
|
|
Post by bigkev on Jun 16, 2024 15:30:19 GMT
Up to 14 years could be the most relevant part Jamesy? IMHO THAT IS A SHOCKING PRICE FOR A RAV NOT FAR OFF 20 years auld, and if yer mate has a garage that does MOTs, he won’t give it a fail. That unfortunately seems to be the case up here…..some cars going around looking more knacked than Charlie. As for mileage……that is high for that kinda money too.
|
|
|
|
Post by firemac on Jun 16, 2024 16:23:08 GMT
Up to 14 years could be the most relevant part Jamesy? IMHO THAT IS A SHOCKING PRICE FOR A RAV NOT FAR OFF 20 years auld, and if yer mate has a garage that does MOTs, he won’t give it a fail. That unfortunately seems to be the case up here…..some cars going around looking more knacked than Charlie. As for mileage……that is high for that kinda money too. I’m gonna come up to your neck of the woods for my next MoTs then ‘cause the testers down here all seem to be frigging nazis!😂 |
|
